Votação: Endangered Species Protection
+3
Scream_off
Kalmar
Aldonin
7 participantes
Página 1 de 1
Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Description: RECOGNIZING:
1) That in the ever-expanding industrial world, it is virtually impossible to avoid endangering the welfare of certain entire animal species.
2) That in the past, industry has callously driven hundreds of animal species to extinction.
3) The welfare of human populations on many planets is directly dependent on the health of their planets' ecosystem.
4) Without legislation, many more species will be driven to extinction.
APPALLED:
1) That certain nations and businesses knowingly destroy entire ecosystems and endanger species, even driving some to extinction.
2) In many cases, conservation efforts are non-existent, extremely badly organized, or otherwise ineffective.
HEREBY:
- Requires nations to restrict encroachments onto habitats of endangered animals, pollution levels in and around the habitats of endangered species, and hunting of endangered animals based on WA Endangered Species Committee determinations (Described later).
- Forms the WA Endangered Species Committee (WAESC) with the following and responsibilities:
1) The WAESC is responsible for determining reasonable numbers at which each species will be considered endangered.
2) The WAESC is responsible for accurately monitoring species’ numbers.
3) Should a species become endangered, or exhibit repeated numeric decline, the WAESC is responsible for creation of and direction of conservation efforts.
4) Should a species become endangered, the WAESC is responsible for protecting the species' remaining habitat through halting business or residential encroachment into the species' habitat, and by reducing the amount of pollution in the species' habitat. The WAESC may also severely restrict the hunting of endangered species.
5) Should a species come so near extinction that saving them in the wild is not feasible, the WAESC is responsible for capturing remaining members of the species, and attempting to repopulate the species enough to be released back into the wild.
- Should the WAESC restrict hunting of an endangered animal that a non-industrial tribe, or non-industrial aboriginal group relies upon for survival, the WAESC must ensure that the group is not destroyed or threatened by the restrictions it imposes.
- The WAESC may determine not to protect a species that is becoming endangered if that species is determined to be a threat to public health due to its parasitism or infectiousness (such as a bacteria, virus, or other parasite).
- If the WAESC restricts the usage of privately owned land, and this causes the property to lose value, then the WAESC must justly compensate for the landowner's loss, as well as any other reasonable losses incurred by its land use restriction.
- Urges nations to pass other pieces of legislation for protection of certain species within their own borders.
1) That in the ever-expanding industrial world, it is virtually impossible to avoid endangering the welfare of certain entire animal species.
2) That in the past, industry has callously driven hundreds of animal species to extinction.
3) The welfare of human populations on many planets is directly dependent on the health of their planets' ecosystem.
4) Without legislation, many more species will be driven to extinction.
APPALLED:
1) That certain nations and businesses knowingly destroy entire ecosystems and endanger species, even driving some to extinction.
2) In many cases, conservation efforts are non-existent, extremely badly organized, or otherwise ineffective.
HEREBY:
- Requires nations to restrict encroachments onto habitats of endangered animals, pollution levels in and around the habitats of endangered species, and hunting of endangered animals based on WA Endangered Species Committee determinations (Described later).
- Forms the WA Endangered Species Committee (WAESC) with the following and responsibilities:
1) The WAESC is responsible for determining reasonable numbers at which each species will be considered endangered.
2) The WAESC is responsible for accurately monitoring species’ numbers.
3) Should a species become endangered, or exhibit repeated numeric decline, the WAESC is responsible for creation of and direction of conservation efforts.
4) Should a species become endangered, the WAESC is responsible for protecting the species' remaining habitat through halting business or residential encroachment into the species' habitat, and by reducing the amount of pollution in the species' habitat. The WAESC may also severely restrict the hunting of endangered species.
5) Should a species come so near extinction that saving them in the wild is not feasible, the WAESC is responsible for capturing remaining members of the species, and attempting to repopulate the species enough to be released back into the wild.
- Should the WAESC restrict hunting of an endangered animal that a non-industrial tribe, or non-industrial aboriginal group relies upon for survival, the WAESC must ensure that the group is not destroyed or threatened by the restrictions it imposes.
- The WAESC may determine not to protect a species that is becoming endangered if that species is determined to be a threat to public health due to its parasitism or infectiousness (such as a bacteria, virus, or other parasite).
- If the WAESC restricts the usage of privately owned land, and this causes the property to lose value, then the WAESC must justly compensate for the landowner's loss, as well as any other reasonable losses incurred by its land use restriction.
- Urges nations to pass other pieces of legislation for protection of certain species within their own borders.
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Estou tentado a votar a favor.
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
A lei é do mais vago possivel. Não define absolutamente nada...
Scream_off- OCDE
- Número de Mensagens : 11459
Idade : 36
Capital : Águas Santas
Regime Politico : Republica Federal
Chefe de Estado : Presidente Zé
Data de inscrição : 25/08/2008
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Isto quer criar uma organização que regulamenta as leis ambientais. Eu votei a favor e meu delegado regional também.
O Greenpeace agradece
O Greenpeace agradece
a favor
Eu para já votei a favor!
Muito por causa dos meus cavalos com cabeça de cão hehehehehehehehehe
Tenho que arranjar forma de os proteger !
Muito por causa dos meus cavalos com cabeça de cão hehehehehehehehehe
Tenho que arranjar forma de os proteger !
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Votei a favor.
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Bah, acho mal, quem quer tratar mal os animais do seu país deve ter o direito soberano de o fazer sem ter medo da WA. Isto não é nada mais do que uma intromissão imperdoável nos assuntos internos de um estado.
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
A adesão à WA é voluntária.
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
é voluntária, mas como é uma democracia, cada um tem o direito de dizer e opinar sobre os seus votos. E o delegado está a votar consoante os pareceres daqui do forum, ou pela sua vontade?
Scream_off- OCDE
- Número de Mensagens : 11459
Idade : 36
Capital : Águas Santas
Regime Politico : Republica Federal
Chefe de Estado : Presidente Zé
Data de inscrição : 25/08/2008
A favor
Pelo menos nesta discussão, não vi grande troca de argumentos a favor e contra ... o único a favor foi o meu à cerca de uma espécie em vias de extinção na minha Nação.
Daí a decisão claro que teve que ter a opinião própria.
Daí a decisão claro que teve que ter a opinião própria.
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
na realidade foi um 3-2..
Scream_off- OCDE
- Número de Mensagens : 11459
Idade : 36
Capital : Águas Santas
Regime Politico : Republica Federal
Chefe de Estado : Presidente Zé
Data de inscrição : 25/08/2008
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Scream_off escreveu:na realidade foi um 3-2..
Eu não criei votações por isso mesmo. Estes tópicos de discussão são para sentir o pulso à região. Um 3-2 não é indicativo de uma vontade regional. Isto é só para discussão.
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Exacto, eu não discordo contigo.
Scream_off- OCDE
- Número de Mensagens : 11459
Idade : 36
Capital : Águas Santas
Regime Politico : Republica Federal
Chefe de Estado : Presidente Zé
Data de inscrição : 25/08/2008
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Ah, OK, pensei que já não quisesses ser meu amigo
Aldonin- Número de Mensagens : 104
Data de inscrição : 01/10/2009
Re: Votação: Endangered Species Protection
Aldonin escreveu:Ah, OK, pensei que já não quisesses ser meu amigo
Ora essa...
Scream_off- OCDE
- Número de Mensagens : 11459
Idade : 36
Capital : Águas Santas
Regime Politico : Republica Federal
Chefe de Estado : Presidente Zé
Data de inscrição : 25/08/2008
Página 1 de 1
Permissões neste sub-fórum
Não podes responder a tópicos
|
|